Legal Uncertainty Regarding Pretrial Decisions Regarding Objects of Suspect Determination that have been Revoked and Declared Invalid
Ketidak Pastian Hukum Putusan Praperadilan tentang Objek Penetapan Tersangka yang telah Dibatalkan dan Dinyatakan Tidak Sah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64344/djl.v2i1.89%20Keywords:
Legal Uncertainty, Pretrial, Determination of Suspects, Legal Certainty, Criminal Procedure LawAbstract
This study examines the phenomenon of repetition of suspect determination in the Indonesian criminal law system, especially after the revocation of suspect determination through the pretrial mechanism. The pretrial process aims to test the legality of the actions of law enforcement officials, such as arrests, detentions, and determination of suspects, in order to protect human rights. However, legal problems arise when investigators again designate a person as a suspect after the determination of the suspect in the case is invalid based on a pretrial verdict, which raises questions about the legality of the act and the potential violation of the principle ne bis in idem, which is the prohibition of prosecuting someone for the same case more than once. This study aims to analyze the authority of investigators in issuing the same investigation warrant after the revocation of the suspect's designation, as well as its impact on the rights of suspects and applicable legal principles, such as justice and legal certainty. Through a normative juridical approach, this study identifies legal loopholes in the regulations governing the repetition of the determination of suspects after the cancellation of pretrial detention. This study also examines the application of the principle ne bis in idem comparatively in international law and Indonesian law, as well as evaluates the supervisory mechanism for investigator authority. The results of the study show that the Indonesian legal system needs significant revisions to provide legal certainty related to the repetition of the determination of suspects and strengthen supervision of law enforcement officials. The study provides recommendations to improve regulations, increase transparency in the legal process, and propose training for law enforcement officials to ensure better protection of human rights in every pro justicia legal process. Thus, this research contributes to the development of a fairer and more efficient criminal justice system, as well as increasing public trust in the integrity of the Indonesian legal system
References
Abraham, Gunawan Wicaksana. "Rekonstruksi Ruang Lingkup Kewenangan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." Magister Ilmu Hukum, (2022). doi: 10.37303/magister.v10i2.35.
Alimkulov, E. T. "Masalah dalam menjamin hak-hak tersangka selama penyelidikan praperadilan." Habaršy - A̋l-Farabi atyndag̣y K̦azak̦ memlekettik ụlttyk̦ universiteti. Zan̦ seriâsy, undefined (2023). doi: 10.26577/japj.2023.v106.i2.012
Anderson, Claudia N., Cochran, Joshua C., & Montes, Andrea N. "Seberapa
Hukumankah Penahanan Praperadilan? Mengukur Penderitaan Relatif Penahanan Praperadilan." Hukuman & Masyarakat, (2023). doi: 10.1177/14624745231218702.
Anzhari, Anzhari, Sunardi, & Muhibbin, Moh. "Penahanan Tersangka dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia." International Journal of Law, Environment and Natural Resources, (2024). doi: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.56.
Darmawan, Randika Fitrah, Soewondo, Sampurno Slamet, & Alwi, Sabir. "Penggunaan Asas Beban Pembuktian Terbalik sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Kesalahan yang Dilakukan oleh Dokter." Sasi, (2021). doi: 10.47268/sasi.v27i2.426.
Faisal, Fitriah. "Proses Hukum yang Adil: Hakim Pemeriksaan Praperadilan dan Pemeriksaan Awal dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia." Jurnal Internasional Hukum, Kejahatan, dan Keadilan, (2023). doi: 10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i03.003.
Famda, Egga Prasnada, Sunardi, & Muhibbin, Moh. "Status Lembaga Praperadilan dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum, Lingkungan, dan Sumber Daya Alam Internasional, (2023). doi: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.54.
Giri, Amir, & Muryawan. "Putusan Praperadilan yang Menyimpang secara Fundamental." Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, (2021). doi: 10.51749/jphi.v2i2.30.
Made, Oka, Lesmana, Sri Jaya, & Lestari, Tiara Ayu. "Uji Materiil Terkait Akuntabilitas Penyidik Kepolisian dalam Kasus Penangkapan yang Tidak Sah." Jurnal Internasional Hukum dan Administrasi Negara , (2024). doi: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v2i3.147.
Mustawa, Nur, Zubaedah, Siti, & Hamid, Abdul. "Sinkronisasi Sistem Pemberitaan Pers dalam Menerapkan Prinsip Due Process of Law." Jurnal Legalisasi Hukum Indonesia, (2023). doi: 10.35965/ijlf.v5i2.2203.
Nurbaedah, Nurbaedah. "Studi Yuridis tentang Reformasi Sistem Hukum Acara Pidana Terkait Lembaga Praperadilan setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia." Jurnal Akta, (2022). doi: 10.30659/akta.v9i2.21530.
Pawelec, Kazimierz. "Larangan Bukti, Rahasia Profesi, dan Lainnya serta Upaya Mengelakinya Selama Kegiatan Operasional-Penyelidikan dan Proses Hukum." Cybersecurity and Law, (2024). doi: 10.35467/cal/188574.
Sipayung, Baren, & Wahyudi, Andi. "Penentuan Praperadilan Terhadap Tersangka dalam Kasus Korupsi: Analisis Kritis Putusan Hakim Sarpin Rizaldi dan Implikasinya bagi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia." Jurnal Politik, Hukum dan Sosial, (2024). doi: 10.59653/jplls.v2i03.1084.
Widhanita, Nurul Y. Badilla. "Implementasi Pasal 184 KUHP terhadap Penanganan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Sulit Ditemukan Barang Bukti (Studi Kasus di Kepolisian Resort Merauke)." Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, (2022). doi: 10.23887/jkh.v8i2.51744.
Wibowo, Moch Adhitya Rifka, & Sunarto. "Analisis Yuridis Peran Praperadilan dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia." Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 1.1 (2024): 306–320.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suparji Ahmad, R Ardi Wirakusumah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
